Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 01:19

What’s next?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Inside Sly and the Family Stone’s Great, Lost Live Album - Rolling Stone
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Two former Polygon writers are starting a new site - The Verge
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
15,000 Light-Years Away, Something Is Blinking – And It Might Rewrite Physics - SciTechDaily
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
How and why do cats purr? Scientists finally found the answers - Earth.com
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Yvette Cooper yet to agree deal three days before spending review - BBC
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Night Owls Face Faster Cognitive Decline - Neuroscience News
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.